directed research & development (ldrd) program Search Results


99
Zymo Research direct zol rna miniprep
Direct Zol Rna Miniprep, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/directed+research+%26+development+(ldrd)+program/Direct-zol+RNA+Miniprep+Plus/pmc13088541-129-9-15
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
direct zol rna miniprep - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Zymo Research direct zol rna kit method
Direct Zol Rna Kit Method, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/directed+research+%26+development+(ldrd)+program/Direct-zol+RNA+Miniprep/pmc13078997-269-19-23
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
direct zol rna kit method - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Zymo Research direct zol rna microprep kit
Direct Zol Rna Microprep Kit, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/directed+research+%26+development+(ldrd)+program/Direct-zol+RNA+Microprep/pm42036778-64-11-15
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
direct zol rna microprep kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Zymo Research directzol 96 magbead rna kit
Directzol 96 Magbead Rna Kit, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/directed+research+%26+development+(ldrd)+program/Direct-zol-96+MagBead+RNA/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__03__22__713451-206-5-9
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
directzol 96 magbead rna kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Zymo Research ez dna methylation
Ez Dna Methylation, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/directed+research+%26+development+(ldrd)+program/EZ+DNA+Methylation-Direct+Kit/10__1016_slash_j__isci__2026__115475-581-12-17
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ez dna methylation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Zymo Research ez 96 dna methylation directtm magprep kit
Ez 96 Dna Methylation Directtm Magprep Kit, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/directed+research+%26+development+(ldrd)+program/EZ-96+DNA+Methylation-Direct+MagPrep/pm41820466-111-7-12
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ez 96 dna methylation directtm magprep kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Transnetyx pcr genotyping
Pcr Genotyping, supplied by Transnetyx, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/directed+research+%26+development+(ldrd)+program/Automated+Genotyping/pm41781615-628-0-10
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pcr genotyping - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Zymo Research direct zol tm dna rna miniprep kit
Direct Zol Tm Dna Rna Miniprep Kit, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/directed+research+%26+development+(ldrd)+program/Direct-zol+DNA%2FRNA+Miniprep/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__03__05__709801-272-18-25
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
direct zol tm dna rna miniprep kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Zymo Research rna isolation
Illustration of AOC 1020 structure and activity evaluation of DUX4-targeted siRNAs <t>in</t> <t>myotubes</t> derived from FSHD patients. ( A ) Scheme of the AOC 1020 structure (drug-antibody ratio equal to 1). siDUX4.6 modification pattern is outlined in . ( B ) Primary FSHD patient-derived myoblasts were transfected with DUX4 -targeting siRNAs and induced to differentiate into myotubes to perform gene expression analysis. The FSHD composite score integrates the gene expression levels of four DUX4-regulated genes ( MBD3L2, ZSCAN4, LEUTX , and KHDC1L ). Screening of the DUX4 siRNA library was performed in FSHD1 patient-derived primary myotubes MB06 at 10 nM final concentration. Data are represented as a percentage of mock transfection control (mean ± SD, n = 4 for library siRNAs, n = 8 for controls). ( C ) Activity of siDUX4.6 was evaluated across nine FSHD donor myotubes (MB06 data are the same as in panel B) (mean ± SD; n = 4 for siRNAs; n = 8 for mocks for MB03, MB04, and MB10; n = 4 for mocks for MB01, MB05, MB11, and MB12). Myotubes were collected 2 days (MB01, MB03), 3 days (MB02, MB05, MB07, MB10, MB11, MB12), or 4 days (MB04, MB06) after inducing differentiation ( D ). In vitro potency of the siDUX4.6 sequence was evaluated by concentration-response in two FSHD1 patient-derived primary myotubes (MB05, MB06). Data in the graphs are represented as a percentage of mock transfection control (mean ± SD, n = 4 for siRNA, n = 28 for mock). Log(inhibitor) versus response three-parameter calculation was used to fit the concentration-response curves. The best-fitting values for EC 50 (half maximal effective concentration) and E max (maximum response) are reported in the table. CTRL, control; FSHD, facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy; NTC, non-targeting control; siRNA, small interfering <t>ribonucleic</t> <t>acid.</t>
Rna Isolation, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/directed+research+%26+development+(ldrd)+program/Direct-zol-96+RNA/pmc13120848-49-12-19
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rna isolation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Zymo Research ez 96 dnamethylation directtm magprep kit
Illustration of AOC 1020 structure and activity evaluation of DUX4-targeted siRNAs <t>in</t> <t>myotubes</t> derived from FSHD patients. ( A ) Scheme of the AOC 1020 structure (drug-antibody ratio equal to 1). siDUX4.6 modification pattern is outlined in . ( B ) Primary FSHD patient-derived myoblasts were transfected with DUX4 -targeting siRNAs and induced to differentiate into myotubes to perform gene expression analysis. The FSHD composite score integrates the gene expression levels of four DUX4-regulated genes ( MBD3L2, ZSCAN4, LEUTX , and KHDC1L ). Screening of the DUX4 siRNA library was performed in FSHD1 patient-derived primary myotubes MB06 at 10 nM final concentration. Data are represented as a percentage of mock transfection control (mean ± SD, n = 4 for library siRNAs, n = 8 for controls). ( C ) Activity of siDUX4.6 was evaluated across nine FSHD donor myotubes (MB06 data are the same as in panel B) (mean ± SD; n = 4 for siRNAs; n = 8 for mocks for MB03, MB04, and MB10; n = 4 for mocks for MB01, MB05, MB11, and MB12). Myotubes were collected 2 days (MB01, MB03), 3 days (MB02, MB05, MB07, MB10, MB11, MB12), or 4 days (MB04, MB06) after inducing differentiation ( D ). In vitro potency of the siDUX4.6 sequence was evaluated by concentration-response in two FSHD1 patient-derived primary myotubes (MB05, MB06). Data in the graphs are represented as a percentage of mock transfection control (mean ± SD, n = 4 for siRNA, n = 28 for mock). Log(inhibitor) versus response three-parameter calculation was used to fit the concentration-response curves. The best-fitting values for EC 50 (half maximal effective concentration) and E max (maximum response) are reported in the table. CTRL, control; FSHD, facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy; NTC, non-targeting control; siRNA, small interfering <t>ribonucleic</t> <t>acid.</t>
Ez 96 Dnamethylation Directtm Magprep Kit, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/directed+research+%26+development+(ldrd)+program/EZ-96+DNA+Methylation-Direct+Kit+(Shallow-+well)/pm41565913-166-39-43
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ez 96 dnamethylation directtm magprep kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Toronto Research Chemicals direct blue 218
Illustration of AOC 1020 structure and activity evaluation of DUX4-targeted siRNAs <t>in</t> <t>myotubes</t> derived from FSHD patients. ( A ) Scheme of the AOC 1020 structure (drug-antibody ratio equal to 1). siDUX4.6 modification pattern is outlined in . ( B ) Primary FSHD patient-derived myoblasts were transfected with DUX4 -targeting siRNAs and induced to differentiate into myotubes to perform gene expression analysis. The FSHD composite score integrates the gene expression levels of four DUX4-regulated genes ( MBD3L2, ZSCAN4, LEUTX , and KHDC1L ). Screening of the DUX4 siRNA library was performed in FSHD1 patient-derived primary myotubes MB06 at 10 nM final concentration. Data are represented as a percentage of mock transfection control (mean ± SD, n = 4 for library siRNAs, n = 8 for controls). ( C ) Activity of siDUX4.6 was evaluated across nine FSHD donor myotubes (MB06 data are the same as in panel B) (mean ± SD; n = 4 for siRNAs; n = 8 for mocks for MB03, MB04, and MB10; n = 4 for mocks for MB01, MB05, MB11, and MB12). Myotubes were collected 2 days (MB01, MB03), 3 days (MB02, MB05, MB07, MB10, MB11, MB12), or 4 days (MB04, MB06) after inducing differentiation ( D ). In vitro potency of the siDUX4.6 sequence was evaluated by concentration-response in two FSHD1 patient-derived primary myotubes (MB05, MB06). Data in the graphs are represented as a percentage of mock transfection control (mean ± SD, n = 4 for siRNA, n = 28 for mock). Log(inhibitor) versus response three-parameter calculation was used to fit the concentration-response curves. The best-fitting values for EC 50 (half maximal effective concentration) and E max (maximum response) are reported in the table. CTRL, control; FSHD, facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy; NTC, non-targeting control; siRNA, small interfering <t>ribonucleic</t> <t>acid.</t>
Direct Blue 218, supplied by Toronto Research Chemicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/directed+research+%26+development+(ldrd)+program/Direct+Blue+218/pmc06868041-50-4-10
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
direct blue 218 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Illustration of AOC 1020 structure and activity evaluation of DUX4-targeted siRNAs in myotubes derived from FSHD patients. ( A ) Scheme of the AOC 1020 structure (drug-antibody ratio equal to 1). siDUX4.6 modification pattern is outlined in . ( B ) Primary FSHD patient-derived myoblasts were transfected with DUX4 -targeting siRNAs and induced to differentiate into myotubes to perform gene expression analysis. The FSHD composite score integrates the gene expression levels of four DUX4-regulated genes ( MBD3L2, ZSCAN4, LEUTX , and KHDC1L ). Screening of the DUX4 siRNA library was performed in FSHD1 patient-derived primary myotubes MB06 at 10 nM final concentration. Data are represented as a percentage of mock transfection control (mean ± SD, n = 4 for library siRNAs, n = 8 for controls). ( C ) Activity of siDUX4.6 was evaluated across nine FSHD donor myotubes (MB06 data are the same as in panel B) (mean ± SD; n = 4 for siRNAs; n = 8 for mocks for MB03, MB04, and MB10; n = 4 for mocks for MB01, MB05, MB11, and MB12). Myotubes were collected 2 days (MB01, MB03), 3 days (MB02, MB05, MB07, MB10, MB11, MB12), or 4 days (MB04, MB06) after inducing differentiation ( D ). In vitro potency of the siDUX4.6 sequence was evaluated by concentration-response in two FSHD1 patient-derived primary myotubes (MB05, MB06). Data in the graphs are represented as a percentage of mock transfection control (mean ± SD, n = 4 for siRNA, n = 28 for mock). Log(inhibitor) versus response three-parameter calculation was used to fit the concentration-response curves. The best-fitting values for EC 50 (half maximal effective concentration) and E max (maximum response) are reported in the table. CTRL, control; FSHD, facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy; NTC, non-targeting control; siRNA, small interfering ribonucleic acid.

Journal: Nucleic Acids Research

Article Title: Development of a DUX4 -targeting antibody oligonucleotide conjugate as a therapy for FSHD

doi: 10.1093/nar/gkag301

Figure Lengend Snippet: Illustration of AOC 1020 structure and activity evaluation of DUX4-targeted siRNAs in myotubes derived from FSHD patients. ( A ) Scheme of the AOC 1020 structure (drug-antibody ratio equal to 1). siDUX4.6 modification pattern is outlined in . ( B ) Primary FSHD patient-derived myoblasts were transfected with DUX4 -targeting siRNAs and induced to differentiate into myotubes to perform gene expression analysis. The FSHD composite score integrates the gene expression levels of four DUX4-regulated genes ( MBD3L2, ZSCAN4, LEUTX , and KHDC1L ). Screening of the DUX4 siRNA library was performed in FSHD1 patient-derived primary myotubes MB06 at 10 nM final concentration. Data are represented as a percentage of mock transfection control (mean ± SD, n = 4 for library siRNAs, n = 8 for controls). ( C ) Activity of siDUX4.6 was evaluated across nine FSHD donor myotubes (MB06 data are the same as in panel B) (mean ± SD; n = 4 for siRNAs; n = 8 for mocks for MB03, MB04, and MB10; n = 4 for mocks for MB01, MB05, MB11, and MB12). Myotubes were collected 2 days (MB01, MB03), 3 days (MB02, MB05, MB07, MB10, MB11, MB12), or 4 days (MB04, MB06) after inducing differentiation ( D ). In vitro potency of the siDUX4.6 sequence was evaluated by concentration-response in two FSHD1 patient-derived primary myotubes (MB05, MB06). Data in the graphs are represented as a percentage of mock transfection control (mean ± SD, n = 4 for siRNA, n = 28 for mock). Log(inhibitor) versus response three-parameter calculation was used to fit the concentration-response curves. The best-fitting values for EC 50 (half maximal effective concentration) and E max (maximum response) are reported in the table. CTRL, control; FSHD, facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy; NTC, non-targeting control; siRNA, small interfering ribonucleic acid.

Article Snippet: Myotubes were collected in TRIzol and stored at −80°C until processing for RNA isolation using Direct-zol-96 RNA isolation kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol.

Techniques: Activity Assay, Derivative Assay, Modification, Transfection, Gene Expression, Concentration Assay, Control, In Vitro, Sequencing

Transcriptome-wide effect of siDUX4.6 on DUX4-regulated genes in FSHD myotubes. Differential gene expression data are presented as volcano plots. One healthy (MB07) and three FSHD patient-derived primary myoblast cell lines (MB02, MB05, MB06) were treated with 10 nM siDUX4.6. Myotubes were collected in Trizol 3 days (MB02, MB05, MB07) or 4 days (MB06) after inducing differentiation, and gene expression was analyzed by RNA sequencing. The significance was established as FDR<0.05. ( A ) Average differential gene expression of three FSHD patient myotubes compared with one healthy donor myotube is plotted, all samples treated with non-targeting control siRNA. ( B ) Average differential gene expression of three FSHD patient myotubes treated with 10 nM siDUX4.6 versus non-targeting control siRNA is plotted. n = 4 for treatment in each individual cell line. Arrows at the bottom of the graphs indicate if genes were upregulated or downregulated. DE, differentially expressed; FC, fold-change; FDR, false discovery rate; FSHD, facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy; siRNA, small interfering ribonucleic acid.

Journal: Nucleic Acids Research

Article Title: Development of a DUX4 -targeting antibody oligonucleotide conjugate as a therapy for FSHD

doi: 10.1093/nar/gkag301

Figure Lengend Snippet: Transcriptome-wide effect of siDUX4.6 on DUX4-regulated genes in FSHD myotubes. Differential gene expression data are presented as volcano plots. One healthy (MB07) and three FSHD patient-derived primary myoblast cell lines (MB02, MB05, MB06) were treated with 10 nM siDUX4.6. Myotubes were collected in Trizol 3 days (MB02, MB05, MB07) or 4 days (MB06) after inducing differentiation, and gene expression was analyzed by RNA sequencing. The significance was established as FDR<0.05. ( A ) Average differential gene expression of three FSHD patient myotubes compared with one healthy donor myotube is plotted, all samples treated with non-targeting control siRNA. ( B ) Average differential gene expression of three FSHD patient myotubes treated with 10 nM siDUX4.6 versus non-targeting control siRNA is plotted. n = 4 for treatment in each individual cell line. Arrows at the bottom of the graphs indicate if genes were upregulated or downregulated. DE, differentially expressed; FC, fold-change; FDR, false discovery rate; FSHD, facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy; siRNA, small interfering ribonucleic acid.

Article Snippet: Myotubes were collected in TRIzol and stored at −80°C until processing for RNA isolation using Direct-zol-96 RNA isolation kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol.

Techniques: Gene Expression, Derivative Assay, RNA Sequencing, Control